§
Sovereign.Software
↓ .MD

← The Sovereign Software Index

Tasks & Finance

Actual Budget

Local-first zero-based budgeting. Runs entirely offline against a local SQLite database and synchronizes across devices via verifiable Hybrid Logical Clock CRDT messages.

1. Overview

Local-first zero-based budgeting. Runs entirely offline against a local SQLite database and synchronizes across devices via verifiable Hybrid Logical Clock CRDT messages.

Category: Tasks & Finance.

2. Version and scope assessed

Version assessed: Source commit d1a536f35c5a114eda0582d5a1d744a9103cc90e; export, import, and automatic backup implementation inspected.

3. Overall determination

Computing determination

4. Principle profile

Principle findings for Actual Budget
OrderPrincipleFinding
ISovereigntyNot assessed
IILongevityNot assessed
IIILocality✓ Meets
IVTransparency and ControlNot assessed

5. Fundamental requirements

Fundamental requirements for Actual Budget
RequirementStatus
E1 Independent access to essential information✓ Pass
E2 Practicable exit and migration? Not Verified
E3 Independent interpretation and recovery? Not Verified
E4 Continuing authority and custody over already-created work✓ Pass
E5 Governability of consequential actions? Not Verified

6. Evidence and verification

7. Migration and recovery

Native storage format: Client-Side SQLite + Merkle CRDTs.

Synchronization or runtime model: Self-Hosted Docker Sync with E2EE.

Example export or inspection command (not verified against any particular version or data set): Export standard SQLite / CSV archive

8. Architectural strengths

Established strengths and their scope are recorded in the evidence and assessment findings on this page.

9. Architectural limitations

10. Assessment findings and remaining work

Verification scenario: Test local file operation, export and import into a clean install, disconnected edits and sync conflicts, and withdrawal of a hosted server.

What may invalidate an overconfident claim: Identify the local database, sync semantics, encryption configuration, and complete recovery independently.

Documentation starting point: https://actualbudget.org/docs/

Assessment update, 23 October 2026:

Assessment: Pinned source inspection establishes concrete export and backup boundaries. It does not demonstrate a complete financial restore or migration to another budgeting tool, so the overall determination remains Insufficient evidence.

Human-readable criteria: Can a user export a complete budget, restore it without the provider, preserve rules and history, continue working when the server disappears, and understand or correct bank-sync changes?

Rating reconciliation: 24 October 2026

E3 and E5 remain Not Verified for the existing declared scope. Longevity and Transparency and Control are Not assessed pending their required minimums. Sovereignty is also Not assessed because the required access/exit/custody minimums are not all established. This is a targeted evidence decision, not a finding that the product fails. Existing E1, E4 and Locality findings were not re-certified.

Remaining: balances, rules, schedules, bank-provider credentials, encryption behavior, and full sync-server recovery. E5 needs bank-import/rule/sync authorization, change visibility and correction boundaries in the configured budget.

Next without installing locally: Inspect a synthetic Actual export and expected balances/rules/schedules with SQLite/JSON tools; obtain pinned implementation or externally recorded bank-import, rule, undo and sync/encryption evidence. Use synthetic credentials only.

The individual decision and provenance are retained in evidence/rating-reconciliation/batch-4/. Overall: Insufficient evidence.

Contribute verification evidence for Actual Budget

Have you tested clean-machine restoration, format migration, or failure rollback for Actual Budget? We welcome reproducible laboratory logs, synthetic test fixtures, and independent assessments to resolve open findings.

Read the evaluation protocol · Submit verification records on GitHub

Individually reconciled in rating batch 4 on 24 October 2026. E3/E5 remain Not Verified for explicit missing coverage; dependent unsupported findings corrected. Previously resolved questions are retained, not counted again. E1/E4/Locality were not re-certified by this targeted review. The assessment procedure is described in the methodology.