§
Sovereign.Software
↓ .MD

← The Sovereign Software Index

VCS & Core

Fossil SCM

Engineered by the creator of SQLite. Packages version control, tickets, bug tracking, and wiki documentation into one durable SQLite file that runs an instant local web UI that works offline.

1. Overview

Engineered by the creator of SQLite. Packages version control, tickets, bug tracking, and wiki documentation into one durable SQLite file that runs an instant local web UI that works offline.

Category: VCS & Core.

2. Version and scope assessed

Version assessed: Pinned source 9f1ea15e06b9be018175d231a939d19372fd4b8b.

3. Overall determination

Computing determination

4. Principle profile

Principle findings for Fossil SCM
OrderPrincipleFinding
ISovereigntyNot assessed
IILongevityNot assessed
IIILocality✓ Meets
IVTransparency and ControlNot assessed

5. Fundamental requirements

Fundamental requirements for Fossil SCM
RequirementStatus
E1 Independent access to essential information✓ Pass
E2 Practicable exit and migration? Not Verified
E3 Independent interpretation and recovery? Not Verified
E4 Continuing authority and custody over already-created work✓ Pass
E5 Governability of consequential actions? Not Verified

6. Evidence and verification

7. Migration and recovery

Native storage format: Single Standalone SQLite Database File.

Synchronization or runtime model: Peer-to-peer HTTP/SSH sync.

Example export or inspection command (not verified against any particular version or data set): fossil ui repository.fossil

8. Architectural strengths

Established strengths and their scope are recorded in the evidence and assessment findings on this page.

9. Architectural limitations

10. Assessment findings and remaining work

Verification scenario: Clone a repository, transfer wiki, tickets, users, and attachments, and operate without the origin server.

What may invalidate an overconfident claim: Check what fossil ui demonstrates versus a portable full export.

Documentation starting point: https://fossil-scm.org/home/doc/trunk/www/index.wiki

Evidence update: 23 October 2026

Assessment follow-up: E3/E5 and their associated principle findings are now reconciled in rating batch 1 below. Earlier source/fixture observations remain valid within their stated scope; they are not themselves blanket Pass decisions.

Human-readable criteria: Can users retain complete history and metadata, operate and recover locally, migrate to another implementation, and understand the effects of synchronization or automation?

Rating reconciliation: 23 October 2026

Scope: The existing source-pinned application scope; no new application execution. Individual-custodian perspective. The existing broad preservation/workflow scope is retained, rather than narrowed to the one successfully inspected source path.

CriterionCurrent finding
E3 Independent interpretation and recoveryNot Verified
E5 Governability of consequential actionsNot Verified
LongevityNot assessed
Transparency and ControlNot assessed

E3: The retained source proves Git export omits wiki, tickets, technical notes and attachments, but that is a limitation of this exit route, not proof that native Fossil recovery fails. Complete native restoration of artifacts, accounts, settings, private/shunned content and attachments has not been demonstrated. E3 therefore remains Not Verified.

E5: Purge preview, local graveyard undo and obliterate confirmation are positively established by source inspection. They do not cover the full consequential-operation surface: synchronization/configuration propagation, shunning/rebuild and effective recovery have not been sufficiently established. A guarded purge routine alone does not establish whole-scope E5.

longevity: E3 remains Not Verified for the existing essential-record scope. The methodology requires established E3 before a positive Longevity finding, so the earlier positive rating is withdrawn pending recovery evidence; source/format strengths are retained as facts, not graded as a failure.

transparency: E5 remains Not Verified. The methodology’s Partially meets threshold requires demonstrated minimum oversight, so the earlier positive Transparency and Control finding is withdrawn rather than retained on the strength of one documented control. This is Not assessed, not Does not meet.

Evidence record: evidence/rating-reconciliation/batch-1/README.md and runtime-results.json. No target software was installed. Source inspections remain source inspections; no application-level recovery or destructive action was executed.

Remaining work: The existing open recovery and consequential-action scenarios remain pending; the individually explained E3/E5 blockers above determine the current Not Verified and Not assessed findings.

Contribute verification evidence for Fossil SCM

Have you tested clean-machine restoration, format migration, or failure rollback for Fossil SCM? We welcome reproducible laboratory logs, synthetic test fixtures, and independent assessments to resolve open findings.

Read the evaluation protocol · Submit verification records on GitHub

Rating reconciliation batch 1: E3 Not Verified; E5 Not Verified. Longevity Not assessed; Transparency and Control Not assessed. See the declared scope and reasons below; earlier bounded evidence findings remain recorded. The assessment procedure is described in the methodology.