§
Sovereign.Software
↓ .MD

← The Sovereign Software Index

Graphics & 3D

GIMP

Raster image editor with a native layered format and export to many open formats.

1. Overview

Raster image editor with a native layered format and export to many open formats.

Category: Graphics & 3D.

2. Version and scope assessed

Version assessed: Source commit 84709e20bc45311322a318b20669dc6b52118353; legacy XCF layer records and OpenRaster raster/mode boundaries.

3. Overall determination

Computing determination

4. Principle profile

Principle findings for GIMP
OrderPrincipleFinding
ISovereigntyNot assessed
IILongevityNot assessed
IIILocality✓ Meets
IVTransparency and ControlNot assessed

5. Fundamental requirements

Fundamental requirements for GIMP
RequirementStatus
E1 Independent access to essential information✓ Pass
E2 Practicable exit and migration? Not Verified
E3 Independent interpretation and recovery? Not Verified
E4 Continuing authority and custody over already-created work✓ Pass
E5 Governability of consequential actions? Not Verified

6. Evidence and verification

7. Migration and recovery

Native storage format: Native .xcf layered image, plus open export formats.

Synchronization or runtime model: Local desktop application.

Example export or inspection command (not verified against any particular version or data set): file image.xcf

8. Architectural strengths

Established strengths and their scope are recorded in the evidence and assessment findings on this page.

9. Architectural limitations

10. Assessment findings and remaining work

Evidence update: 23 October 2026

Assessment follow-up: These findings now appear in the application’s evidence and limitations. At the user’s request, existing eligibility and principle ratings are unchanged; E3/E5, principle consistency and blank-status fixes will be reconciled in the next pass. Reproduction details and retained inputs are in evidence/third-pass/batch-5/.

Human-readable criteria: Can a creator preserve editable source work and linked assets, reopen it after software changes, and export a useful representation to independent tools?

Rating reconciliation: 24 October 2026

E3 and E5 remain Not Verified for the existing declared scope. Longevity and Transparency and Control are Not assessed pending their required minimums. Sovereignty is also Not assessed because the required access/exit/custody minimums are not all established. This is a targeted evidence decision, not a finding that the product fails. Existing E1, E4 and Locality findings were not re-certified.

Remaining: Current layered-XCF decoding, text/mask/group/high-bit-depth and ICC fidelity, actual ORA/PSD/TIFF round trips, old/new-version saves, crash recovery and plugin/network controls. E5 needs plugin/script, destructive-edit and save/export overwrite control with explicit undo/recovery limits.

Next without installing locally: Acquire a current synthetic layered XCF plus mask/text/ICC dependencies, expected semantic/pixel records and independent ORA/PSD/TIFF comparisons; seek same-version plugin/save/undo evidence without running the target.

The individual decision and provenance are retained in evidence/rating-reconciliation/batch-6/. Overall: Insufficient evidence.

Contribute verification evidence for GIMP

Have you tested clean-machine restoration, format migration, or failure rollback for GIMP? We welcome reproducible laboratory logs, synthetic test fixtures, and independent assessments to resolve open findings.

Read the evaluation protocol · Submit verification records on GitHub

Individually reconciled in rating batch 6 on 24 October 2026. E3/E5 remain Not Verified for explicit missing coverage; dependent unsupported findings corrected. Previously resolved questions are retained, not counted again. E1/E4/Locality were not re-certified by this targeted review. The assessment procedure is described in the methodology.