§
Sovereign.Software
↓ .MD

← The Sovereign Software Index

Media & Creative

MuseScore Studio

Music notation editor with a documented project archive and export to MusicXML.

1. Overview

Music notation editor with a documented project archive and export to MusicXML.

Category: Media & Creative.

2. Version and scope assessed

Version assessed: Source commit 4676f83f368f1afc9cad6815eb5401a2ec8aca2b; historical MSCZ archive readability and save/backup conditions.

3. Overall determination

Computing determination

4. Principle profile

Principle findings for MuseScore Studio
OrderPrincipleFinding
ISovereigntyNot assessed
IILongevityNot assessed
IIILocality✓ Meets
IVTransparency and ControlNot assessed

5. Fundamental requirements

Fundamental requirements for MuseScore Studio
RequirementStatus
E1 Independent access to essential information✓ Pass
E2 Practicable exit and migration? Not Verified
E3 Independent interpretation and recovery? Not Verified
E4 Continuing authority and custody over already-created work✓ Pass
E5 Governability of consequential actions? Not Verified

6. Evidence and verification

7. Migration and recovery

Native storage format: Project archive (.mscz, a zip of XML), plus MusicXML export.

Synchronization or runtime model: Local desktop application.

Example export or inspection command (not verified against any particular version or data set): unzip -l score.mscz

8. Architectural strengths

Established strengths and their scope are recorded in the evidence and assessment findings on this page.

9. Architectural limitations

10. Assessment findings and remaining work

Assessment update: 23 October 2026

Assessment: The checked findings above now inform this application’s evidence and limitations. They resolve the stated questions, not complete recovery, migration or eligibility. Reproduction details and retained inputs are recorded in evidence/third-pass/batch-4/. The overall determination remains Insufficient evidence for the remaining requirements.

Human-readable criteria: Can a creator archive source material and editable state, reopen the project after version changes, and export important work in interoperable formats?

Rating reconciliation: 24 October 2026

E3 and E5 remain Not Verified for the existing declared scope. Longevity and Transparency and Control are Not assessed pending their required minimums. Sovereignty is also Not assessed because the required access/exit/custody minimums are not all established. The prior E2 Pass is withdrawn; its essential-record migration comparison remains incomplete. This is a targeted evidence decision, not a finding that the product fails. Existing E1, E4 and Locality findings were not re-certified.

Remaining: Current-version MSCZ and MusicXML/MEI/MIDI round trips with notation/layout comparison; old/new release compatibility, actual interrupted saves and recovery, offline playback and export dependencies. E5 also needs effective autosave/backup settings, overwrite and export boundaries and evidence of usable correction after failed/interrupted save.

Next without installing locally: Acquire a current native score plus MusicXML output with expected musical structure/dependencies and comparison results; inspect archives/XML here and reuse externally recorded save/undo/recovery observations for the same version.

The individual decision and provenance are retained in evidence/rating-reconciliation/batch-3/. Overall: Insufficient evidence.

Contribute verification evidence for MuseScore Studio

Have you tested clean-machine restoration, format migration, or failure rollback for MuseScore Studio? We welcome reproducible laboratory logs, synthetic test fixtures, and independent assessments to resolve open findings.

Read the evaluation protocol · Submit verification records on GitHub

Individually reconciled in rating batch 3 on 24 October 2026. E3/E5 remain Not Verified for explicit missing coverage; dependent unsupported findings corrected. 2 further bounded source questions resolved. E1/E4/Locality were not re-certified by this targeted review. The assessment procedure is described in the methodology.